Introduction
I’m Abdul Waheed, Talent Acquisition Lead at Phaedra Solutions in Lahore, and after ten years moving between generalist HR roles and a dedicated recruiting seat, I’ve landed on a view that surprises people outside the function: employer branding isn’t a marketing deliverable that gets handed to recruiters to execute. It’s built or broken inside the recruiting process itself, one candidate interaction at a time.
Most people think of employer branding as a careers page and a set of values on a slide deck. Recruiters know it’s something else. It’s whether a candidate got a straight answer when they asked about the role, whether the interview started on time, whether anyone followed up after a rejection. That’s the part of the brand nobody markets, and it’s the part talent acquisition actually owns.
Employer Branding Is a Candidate Experience, Not a Campaign
A job posting can promise anything. What a candidate actually remembers is how they were treated during the process, the accuracy of the job description against the real role, how quickly a recruiter responded or whether feedback after an interview felt honest or generic. In my current role leading end-to-end talent acquisition at Phaedra Solutions, I’ve had to treat every one of those touchpoints as a branding decision, not just a process step, because candidates talk. A bad interview experience travels further than any careers-page copy.
This isn’t a new idea, but it’s one that’s easy to lose once a company’s marketing team owns “employer brand” as a line item. The brand a candidate experiences is set by the recruiter’s calendar discipline and the hiring manager’s follow-through, not by the tagline on the careers site.
What Owning Both HR and Recruiting Taught Me
Before moving into a dedicated talent acquisition role, I spent six years as Assistant Manager HR at BrainX Technologies, where recruitment sat under the same desk as HR policy, payroll, and performance management. Streamlining that work with AI-driven tools and automation freed up time, but the more useful thing it did was force me to see recruitment and policy as the same system. A policy that looks fine on paper be it a rigid interview process, a slow offer-approval chain, it all becomes a candidate’s first real impression of what it’s like to work at the company. HR and recruiting are usually organized as separate functions, but from a candidate’s perspective, there’s no line between them.
That’s the part of employer branding people miss when they’ve only ever worked in a pure recruiting seat: the brand isn’t just what recruiters say, it’s what the surrounding HR system lets them deliver on.
Where Employer Branding Actually Breaks
The gap almost never shows up in the job posting. It shows up in stakeholder management specifically, the distance between what a hiring manager promises in an interview and what the offer or onboarding process actually delivers. Partnering closely with hiring managers to build recruitment strategy is a core part of my current role, and the honest answer is that most employer branding failures I’ve seen trace back to that handoff: a hiring manager describing a role or a culture that the rest of the organization doesn’t consistently back up. It’s rarely dishonest on purpose that a hiring manager talks about the team they wish they had, or the flexibility they intend to offer, and neither one gets fully delivered once the candidate is actually hired.
A talent acquisition team can write the most honest job description in the world and still lose candidate trust if the people conducting interviews aren’t saying the same thing. That’s not a marketing problem to fix with better copy. It’s a coordination problem, and it sits squarely with recruiting.
What This Means in Practice
If employer branding lives in the recruiting process, then talent acquisition needs a seat in shaping it, not just a brief to execute. That means recruiters flagging when a job description doesn’t match the real day-to-day of a role, pushing back when an interview process is too slow to be respectful of a candidate’s time, and treating consistency across hiring managers as part of the job, not an extra. It also means being willing to have an uncomfortable conversation with a hiring manager before an offer goes out, rather than after a new hire’s first bad week on the job.
None of this replaces the marketing side of employer branding where a strong careers page and clear messaging still matter. But they only hold up if what a candidate experiences during recruitment backs up what they read beforehand. That alignment work belongs to talent acquisition, whether or not it’s written into the job description.
If you’re one of the HR professionals across Pakistan building toward a talent acquisition or employer branding specialization of your own, join the HR Directory to build your visibility on the platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does employer branding require from a talent acquisition team?
It requires talent acquisition to treat every candidate touchpoint — job postings, interview scheduling, communication, feedback — as a branding decision, since candidates form their impression of a company through the hiring process itself, not through marketing materials alone.
Who is Abdul Waheed?
Abdul Waheed is a Talent Acquisition Lead based in Lahore, Pakistan, specializing in end-to-end recruitment, talent strategy, employer branding, and stakeholder management.
Where does Abdul Waheed currently lead talent acquisition?
Abdul Waheed currently leads talent acquisition at Phaedra Solutions in Lahore, Pakistan.
Why does treating employer branding as a talent acquisition responsibility matter for HR professionals?
It matters because employer branding built only through marketing collapses if the recruiting process doesn’t deliver on it — inconsistent hiring manager messaging or a poor candidate experience can undo a strong external brand faster than any campaign can build it.
